Pasting Pickles – #PCS Victory in the High Court: Is it good news?

Department for Communities & Local Government,...
Department for Communities & Local Government, Eland House – Union and Huntingdonshire flags flying (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Tory fruitcake, Eric Pickles, lost a High Court battle last week with the PCS Union.  Pickles has wanted to end the collection of union subs via salary check-off in local government for some time but then decided to do it himself for those working in the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG).  PCS successfully challenged the change and Pickles has been left with a massive bill for £90,000.  Considering the cost of check-off to the department is just £300 per year it’s easy to see that this was a purely ideological attempt to make the unions’ job harder.

It’s understandable for the union to be beside itself with excitement to know that money from subscriptions will continue to enter the organisation automatically.  It ensures that the activists can carry on doing what the bureaucracy expects of them and organising can be controlled from the centre.

However we should look at the benefits of workplace activists having to spend time collecting subs from members on a monthly basis.  And of course we should consider the problems of check-off: namely that  union organising is reliant on help from the employer, embedding a compliant, partnership model of union activity.

Back in the days before check-off union activists had to go around the workplace collecting dues.  To do this discussions had to take place with the members regularly to gauge opinion.  Activists came away not just with the subs but with intelligence from the members on what was happening on the shop floor, the actions of management and the strength of feeling amongst the membership.  The activists were also able to educate the members of the latest union news, the negotiations with management and any plans for action.  By giving subs each month people were renewing their union links manually, keeping up to date with their activists and ensuring that their views were heard.  In other words the rank and file activists were essential in securing the union could function financially; much more so than under current arrangements where some reps prefer to stay hidden in their union offices rather than actually talk to members.

Check-off doesn’t prevent this kind of activity but an end to check-off presents an opportunity to get back to our roots and increase our discussions with members.  Of course we cannot assume that check-off will last forever and unions will no doubt push members to use direct debit in the modern era.  This would be a mistake.  Ruling class attacks on our movement should be resisted but they can also be used to our advantage.  Activists should prepare for an end to check-off and the cosy elements of the relationship between the union and the state.  All out hostility would not break the union; it would likely see rising membership levels and further strike action.

One thought on “Pasting Pickles – #PCS Victory in the High Court: Is it good news?

  1. I agree. I didn’t celebrate this victory as any convenience of this nature reduces rep/member interaction and overall activism suffers. Would it be so bad if reps had to go and collect dues or chase up payments? I see too many reps substituting emails, twitter, Facebook etc for real communication with members and the result is a staff association mentality were reps just communicate the management message. We could do a lot worse than get off the management teet and end reliance on the convenience that weakens us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s